Students to petition EFCC over alleged N208bn fraud at TETFUND

Nigerian University students, under the auspices of the National Association of Universities’ Students (NAUS), have threatened to petition the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate purported plundering of over N208billion Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND) the Federal Government released to the agency.

ConsumerConnect learnt the association said its action became significant in order to rescue the nation’s universities from infrastructural deficit caused by high level of corruption in the utilisation of TETFUND revenues and mismanagement of funds in higher institutions by managements.

NAUS also lashed out at some “amorphous bodies masquerading as Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), criticising it over its consistent call for the investigation of Prof. Suleiman Bogoro, Executive Secretary, TETFUND, over his alleged complicity in the high-level sleaze.

Report says Comrade Aruson David Aridiogo, NAUS’ National Vice President, speaking with journalists recently, in Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State capital, said the Association would stage a protest at the EFCC Office in Abuja to submit a petition on the appropriateness of the investigation anytime from now.

Aridiogo added that the students, who are at the receiving end of poor infrastructure in the public universities across Nigeria won’t fold their arms and allow financial sleaze of this magnitude to be swept under the carpet.

The NAUS leader said it sounded unfathomable that those branding themselves as CSOs could be protecting those that were alleged of corruption.

Their action has portrayed the coalition asking EFCC not to investigate Prof. Bogoro as unscrupulous elements, who only wanted money for survival at the expense of the Nigerian students, he alleged.

“It is interesting to read that CSOs that have been silent on issues of national interest for a long time could suddenly woke from their slumber to rubbish a press statement by NAUS demanding accountability and transparency in terms of how funds are being spent by the Tertiary Education Trust (TETFUND).

“It must be stated without fear of being contradicted that the demand is not ill-conceived, neither was it sponsored by any person or group of persons to tarnish the image of the TETFUND boss.

“Our demand is strictly based on the principle of accountability by a public office holder as we feel that it is very important for the general public to be communicated as to how TETFUND projects are being executed in our universities and the extent of execution on our campuses.

“It is embarrassing that rather than publishing the financial transactions in TETFUND in line with our demands, they disgracefully went ahead to make unsubstantiated statements aimed at discrediting our association and bring us to disrepute while also reducing our demands as being sponsored by politicians.

Isola Moses