*Experts from several world’s top Universities, in a fresh study involving over 1,200 participants, found although Artificial Intelligence boosts ‘short-term performance’ by digital consumers, it may hinder long-term problem-solving skills once removed
Gbenga Kayode | ConsumerConnect
A new study discovered that Artificial Intelligence (AI) assistance improved performance in the moment, but reduced problem-solving ability once the tech tool was removed.
ConsumerConnect reports digital technology experts opined that Artificial Intelligence has quickly become part of consumers’ daily life.
It is also noted that digital consumers, in modern times, have adopted AI tools to write e-mails, answer questions, brainstorm ideas, and even to help with school or work assignments.
OAU: Minister inaugurates hi-tech hub, inspires students to turn ideas into solutions
Researchers found though these tools could save time and make difficult tasks feel easier, new research suggested there might be a downside to relying on them too heavily in contemporary times.
Researchers from several universities, including Carnegie Mellon University, University of Oxford, in the United Kingdom (UK), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), in the United States (US), and UCLA, wanted to understand what happens when digital consumers use AI for reasoning-intensive tasks and then, have to continue without it.
Highlights of study findings
The experts’ findings suggested that AI could boost performance in the short term, but that benefit might come at a cost when digital consumers are later asked to work independently, agency report said.
The study focused on two abilities that are important for learning and problem-solving: persistence, or the willingness to keep working through a challenge, and independent performance, meaning how well someone can complete a task without assistance.
Report also showed the research involved over 1,200 participants across a series of randomised experiments.
It was gathered that in one experiment, participants solved fraction-based math problems.
Some completed the work on their own, while others were given access to an AI assistant for about 10 minutes before the assistance was unexpectedly removed during the experiment.
According to the researchers in respect of results of the study, the AI-assisted group, unsurprisingly, performed better while the technology tool was available.
Participants’ performance after withdrawing AI tool
The studying findings further revealed, that despite initial higher performance, once the AI was taken away, the participants’ performance dropped noticeably, according to report.
Researchers also found that participants who had relied on AI solved fewer problems correctly, and were more likely to skip the experts’ questions altogether than those who never had access to AI in the first place.
Similar patterns appeared in reading-comprehension tasks, stated the experts.
The researchers equally discovered an important distinction.
Participants who used AI mainly to obtain direct answers experienced the largest declines.
Those who used the tool more as a tutor — asking for hints, explanations, or clarification — did not show the same level impairment.
Implications findings for consumers
Researchers said the findings did not suggest that AI is inherently harmful or that consumers should avoid using it.
Instead, the experts noted that the study highlights the importance of how these new technology tools are used.
According to the researchers, AI may be most beneficial when it supports learning rather than replaces the thinking process altogether.
They said for consumers, the takeaway may be simple: use AI as a guide rather than a substitute.
Asking for explanations, examples, or feedback could help to reinforce understanding, while relying on AI to provide complete solutions may make it harder to develop and maintain problem-solving skills over time.
The researchers as well noted that their experiments measured short-term effects, not years of AI use.
Still, because the changes appeared after only a brief interaction with AI, they suggested more research is needed to understand what frequent, long-term reliance on these tools could mean for learning, persistence, and independent thinking.